
Evidence Set One:
Individualised learning
Overview
Evidence Set One is centred around illustrating a variety of ways that I meet the learning needs of each individual child. In a typical single-year classroom, achievement levels may vary by five to six years between the highest and lowest achieving children (Masters, 2013). Within a three-year multi-age Montessori classroom, variation of ability will be greater still. To ensure that children achieve according to their own path of development, it is important that each child is met where they are at in each area of learning, and supported to progress.
An additional challenge in meeting children’s learning needs over the past two years, has been the periods of remote learning that have interrupted the flow of face-to-face learning in the classroom. This has required flexibility and innovation to ensure continuity of learning through online learning.
Each of the artefacts within this evidence set, illustrate different ways in which I have ensured that the curriculum is accessible to all children at an appropriate level of challenge for each child.
Descriptors identified
1.1 Physical, social and intellectual development and characteristics of children
1.2 Understand how students learn
1.5 Differentiate teaching to meet the specific learning needs of students across the full range of abilities
1.6 Strategies to support full participation of students with disability
2.1 Content and teaching strategies of the area
2.2 Content selection and organisation
2.5 Literacy and numeracy strategies
2.6 Information and Communication Technology (ICT)
3.1 Establish challenging learning goals
3.2 Plan, structure and sequence learning programs
3.3 Use teaching strategies
3.4 Select and use resources
3.7 Use effective classroom management
4.4 Maintain student safety
4.5 Use ICT safely, responsibly and ethically
6.1 Identify and plan professional learning needs
6.2 Engage in professional learning and improve practice
6.4 Apply professional learning and improve student learning
7.3 Engage with the parents/carers
Annotation of evidence
Artefact 1-A Reading and writing are an integral part of all learning areas within the class, however skill variation in literacy is broad. Some children come to the class being able to read and write only basic single-syllable phonetic words, while at the other end of the scale, some are writing stories or research of many tens of pages in length with sophisticated vocabulary and spelling. Not only does their ability vary, but also their willingness and level of confidence in engaging with literacy.
I developed the first item within this artefact, a visual phonetic alphabet material, to support a child who displayed great difficulty with the alphabetical principle; the understanding that letters in written words represent the sounds in those words when spoken, and that these letter-sound correspondences are a systematic, predictable and reversible code. This knowledge is essential for learning to read and write (Buckingham, J., Wheldall, & Wheldall, 2019).
The material I developed is based on an online reading program that the child used at home. I worked with her parents to be able to access and simulate the digital picture symbols in a physical material (3.7). The progression of images in this artefact shows the way in which I used this material to build the child’s confidence in reading and writing, and gradually increased the level of challenge to help her progress in her ability to compose, write and read her own sentences (1.1, 1.5, 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 3.2, 3.3, 3.4). Importantly, once she mastered letter-sound correspondence to a level at which she was confident and capable enough to attempt to read and write without the visual alphabet support, she no longer needed to use the material.
The second artefact within this subset, relates to the implementation of Multisensory Structured Language (MSL) in my class to support children with Dyslexia and other learning difficulties in language. This was an area that I identified was lacking within my own knowledge base and following research into the most effective and evidence-based practice for teaching reading, I undertook training in this area (6.1, 6.2, 6.4). The scope and sequence and sample lesson plan illustrate how I am implementing MSL to support children who are still developing their phonological awareness and understanding of the alphabetic principle. The scope and sequence allows for a structured and systematic introduction of skills, with the most basic and most commonly encountered skills introduced first. Children progress through the scope and sequence at their own pace as they master each skill. (1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.6, 2.1, 2.2, 2.5, 3.2, 3.3). At the start of the year, as evidenced in the comments from her Individual Learning Plan (which are on the first page of the scope and sequence), the child in the video was not able to remember the sounds for the letters in the alphabet; yet now she has mastered the individual sounds and is working on attaining fluency and automaticity. As demonstrated in the video, she is also able to apply this skill to writing and reading words. The next phase of implementation of MSL in the class will be to support children at all levels of achievement in language. Rigorous and ongoing diagnostic testing will enable me to identify the continuing impact of MSL on each child’s learning (see Evidence Set 2: Assessment and Reporting).
The final artefact within this subset is a series of differentiated editing guides, to help children improve grammar and punctuation within their writing (1.1, 1.5). Children can select which guide they want to use, thereby supporting autonomy and progression at whatever level a child is at. Once children have finished a draft of their written work, they request an editing conference, and the guides are used during the conference to edit their work. At present these conferences happen with either me or the assistant teacher, however several experienced writers in the class are being trained to become peer editors. These editors must maintain a high level of accuracy in their own writing, thereby developing a culture of high expectations and opportunities for challenge. The final sequence of images show two examples of edited drafts from one child, the second one from 6 months after the first one, showing a marked reduction in the number of edits, demonstrating that the child has internalised these skills (1.1, 1.5, 2.5, 3.1, 3.4).
Artefact 1-B Social-emotional learning in the classroom is a key part of ensuring that children feel (and are) safe at school, enabling children to learn and function well academically (Gueldner, Feuerborn & Merrell, 2020, p. 1). While I regularly integrate social-emotional learning into daily learning in the classroom, some children require additional support in this area (1.1, 1.2, 1.5, 1.6, 2.1). Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) typically display difficulties in social adaptation, such as communication skills and social interaction (Stathopoulou, Loukeris, Karabatzaki, Politi, Salapata & Drigas, 2021). Everyday situations can prove challenging for a child with Autism, leading to maladaptive responses and undesirable behaviours. Social stories can be used to explicitly communicate in a meaningful way, specific information about a situation, a skill, or a concept to children with ASD ( Riga, Ioannidi & Papayiannis, 2021, p. 124).
One child in my class with ASD was regularly becoming upset about interactions with her friends during playtime, which was negatively impacting her ability to effectively engage in learning during class time. One concern she had was feeling left out when her friends played without her. She could not comprehend why they did not include her, and also did not understand how she could communicate her feelings to her friends, or how she could actively solve this problem herself.
As a result, she would often return to class in a state of distress and be unable to engage in learning activities for an extended period. To help her to navigate this situation, I worked with her to create a digital social story to help her learn how to ask to join in with her friends’ play. Together with the student and her friends, we staged and took photos to illustrate the book and we wrote the words together. Involving the child in creating the story personalised the learning experience, enabling the skill to be presented in a compelling and meaningful way and engaging her in the learning process (Riga et al., 2021. p. 129) (2.6, 3.1, 3.3, 3.4). We later wrote another story together after she regularly became upset about her friends having arguments with each-other. This story helped her to make sense of this situation and to know how to respond and be able to process her feelings when this happened.
These social stories were available for her on the class iPad to read whenever required. Eventually she did not use them any more as she gained the skills being modelled in the stories.
Artefact 1-C In accordance with the Disability Standards for Education (2005), children with disability must be able to access and participate in education on the same basis as other students. Where actions and adjustments need to be made to support students with disability, schools lawfully must consult with a child’s parent or carer; furthermore, a collaborative approach between schools, families and other support workers is demonstrated through research to be best practice for working with students with disability (Australian Government, Department of Education and Training, 2015).
One outcome of this collaborative approach can be the identification of specific goals that are documented in an Individual Learning Plan (ILP). In the case of one child in my class with several diagnosed learning disabilities, the child required support around literacy as well as executive functioning and working memory. An ILP was developed in collaboration with her parents and with input from an external support agency the child accessed outside of school, including specific literacy support strategies, some of which incorporate the use of information and communication technology (ICT) (1.5, 1.6, 2.5, 2.6, 3.1, 3.4, 3.7). The ILP involved supports for both face-to-face learning as well as adjustments for home learning, if needed. The provision of these adjustments meant that the child could engage in classroom activities with greater confidence and success.
Artefact 1-D The shift to remote learning during periods of Covid lockdown over the past two years required completely new ways of teaching and learning, necessitating flexibility and innovation on the part of both teachers and students. The first lockdown in 2020 brought to light the many challenges of delivering online learning, and I was keen to consider the experiences of the families in my class when faced with the prospect of a second period of remote learning in 2021. I therefore designed a survey to gather the views of families about what had worked well for them during the first period of home learning, as well as things they found less useful or challenging. I also included free-text fields for more general feedback and sharing of experiences (7.3). Every respondent to the survey identified weekly one-on-one conferences with them and/or their child to be valuable; and although conferences were time-consuming, it was something that I prioritised due to the value placed on them by families. Access to recorded lessons were also highly valued, and part of this involved ensuring the safety of children online by consulting with parents to gain their consent for their children to participate in lessons that were being recorded (4.4, 4.5, 7.3).
Artefact 1-E A distinction in the way that children learn mathematics in a Montessori classroom, is through the use of concrete materials. These are meant to be a support for building and creating understanding. However, at a certain point these exact same materials will become a limitation for the child. Observation and conferencing is therefore important to detect when a child is ready to be challenged further and to move towards abstraction of a concept. The photo captioned, ‘Observations of three different children working on single-digit distributive division’, shows the different levels of abstraction of three children who were given the lesson around the same time, providing information on whether they are ready to progress or need further practise (2.5, 3.2, 3.4, 5.1, 5.2, 5.4).
Importantly, during new presentations I will only present a small number of examples, and allow the child to write their own problems during follow up work. For example, in the photo captioned, ‘Independent follow up work on divisibility’, the children have chosen the numbers along the left-hand side and applied their knowledge of divisibility to determine whether each of these is divisible by the numbers written across the top of the board. They have also chosen these numbers, having been presented divisibility by the numbers up to and including 9, but have expanded the chart on their own. As illustrated by all of the photos in this artefact, primary-aged children love to write and solve big problems; should they encounter a difficult problem that involves a special case they have not yet experienced, they will either ask for help or work out how to solve it themselves. By doing so, they are expanding their own limits (1.5).
Reflections
Literacy is a foundational skill that allows children to learn across all other areas of the curriculum. As described by Richardson, Morgan, and Fleener (2012), “Literacy skills help us learn how to learn. Literacy is a tool that must be used in every classroom, at every grade level, and in every school to provide the application and practice necessary for students to become effective learners” (p.3). Being able to support children to advance their literacy skills and enable them to engage in learning areas, whatever level they are at, has been a key focus for me in my teaching career so far, and it was this that led me to learn more about the science of reading and the practice of Multisensory Structured Language. So far, the technique has had positive impacts on learners with difficulties in literacy learning, and I am currently in the process of implementing MSL across my entire class to determine the extent to which it can help children at all levels to advance their literacy skills. Diagnostic testing will form a large part of evaluating the effectiveness of this approach and will enable me to share this knowledge with my peers.
Social-emotional learning is also an important part of learning more broadly, and competence in social-emotional domains has shown to improve academic performance while also providing children with the skills for success in all areas of their lives beyond school – personal, professional and civic (Ragozzino, Resnik, Utne-O’Brien & Weissberg, 2003). Children with ASD often have impairments in social interactions, which can lead to social withdrawal and isolation, ultimately affecting their educational experience (Karal & Wolfe, 2018). The use of digital social stories that were personalised and in which the child participated in creating, was a powerful learning experience for both of us. It ultimately resulted in the child learning the strategies being depicted in the stories, and eventually she did not need to read the stories any longer. This was a new teaching strategy that I adopted and that I now have experience in for supporting other children in future.
Enabling children to access the curriculum, whether it be a child with diagnosed learning disabilities, or those who are achieving at the highest levels, is challenging; however I feel privileged to be able to teach within a school in which individualised learning is the expected practice. I have found the process of being involved in developing and implementing Individual Learning Plans (ILPs) and navigating the intricacies of balancing the needs of the child with the goals held by their parents, to be challenging yet ultimately rewarding. The resultant collaboration between school and families and a mutual desire to see the child succeed has also driven my own professional learning as I have identified areas in which I lacked sufficient confidence and skill, and have sought training to fill these professional gaps.